Skip to main content

CDN Comparison 2025

AWS CloudFront vs Cloudflare: CDN Comparison for 2025

A technical comparison of CloudFront and Cloudflare — WAF cost models, edge compute capabilities, DDoS protection, and when AWS-native integration outweighs Cloudflare's simplicity.

Last updated:

Ask AI:ChatGPTClaudePerplexityGemini

Quick Answer: Cloudflare wins for simplicity, free tier generosity, and global CDN. CloudFront wins when tight AWS service integration (ALB, S3, WAF, Lambda@Edge) is required.

Freshness Check (June 2026)

Use this page as a decision framework, then validate the latest pricing, quotas, and region-level feature parity in AWS documentation before final sign-off.

This page was refreshed against official AWS announcements and service documentation published in the last 12 months. Confirm region support, quotas, and pricing before final architecture sign-off.

CloudFront and Cloudflare both accelerate content delivery and protect origins from malicious traffic — but they are built around fundamentally different assumptions. CloudFront is an AWS-native service optimized for deep integration with the AWS ecosystem. Cloudflare is a standalone network security and performance platform that works with any infrastructure.

Choosing between them is as much an organizational decision as a technical one.

Overview

AWS CloudFrontCloudflare
Network size~600 edge locations300+ PoPs (denser in emerging markets)
Business modelPay-as-you-go (AWS billing)Tiered plans (Free / Pro / Business / Enterprise)
Core strengthAWS-native integrationDeveloper experience, zero cold starts, simpler pricing
Edge computeLambda@Edge, CloudFront FunctionsWorkers (V8 isolates, 0 cold start)
WAFAWS WAF (separate charge)Included in Pro/Business plans
DDoS protectionShield Standard (free), Shield Advanced ($3K/mo)Free unmetered DDoS on all plans
Free tier12-month AWS Free Tier, then pay-as-you-goPermanent free tier with unlimited bandwidth

WAF Cost Model: A Critical Difference

WAF costs are where the two platforms diverge most sharply in pricing model.

AWS WAF pricing:

  • $5.00/month per WebACL
  • $1.00/month per rule group
  • $0.60 per million requests evaluated

A typical production WebACL with 10 custom rules processing 100 million requests/month costs approximately $65/month before any data transfer. If you also need bot control or account takeover prevention rules, add another $10/month each.

Cloudflare WAF pricing:

  • Included in Pro ($20/month) — managed rule sets, rate limiting, 5 custom rules
  • Included in Business ($200/month) — full managed WAF, 20 custom rules, OWASP ruleset
  • Enterprise — custom pricing with advanced rule sets

For a medium-traffic application running 500 million requests/month with a full managed WAF ruleset, Cloudflare Business is significantly cheaper than equivalent CloudFront + AWS WAF. The math changes for organizations that are already paying for AWS Shield Advanced — Shield Advanced includes AWS WAF usage at no extra charge for resources it protects, effectively making WAF free if you need advanced DDoS protection anyway.

Edge Compute: Lambda@Edge vs Cloudflare Workers

Edge compute is where the architectural differences are most significant.

Lambda@EdgeCloudFront FunctionsCloudflare Workers
Cold start100–500 ms< 1 ms~0 ms (V8 isolates)
Max execution time30 s (viewer) / 30 s (origin)1 ms50 ms (CPU time)
Memory128 MB – 10 GB2 MB128 MB
RuntimesNode.js, PythonJavaScript (ES5)JS, TS, Python, Rust, WASM
AWS SDK accessYesNoNo (use fetch)
Locations13 regional caches600+ edge locations300+ PoPs
PricingLambda pricing + data transfer$0.10/million invocations100K/day free, $0.30/million after

When Lambda@Edge is the right choice:

  • You need AWS SDK access at the edge (calling DynamoDB, Secrets Manager, etc.)
  • Your edge logic uses IAM authentication or AWS service APIs
  • You are performing A/B testing, authentication, or URL rewriting that benefits from AWS IAM integration
  • Your team is already operating Lambda functions and prefers operational consistency

When Cloudflare Workers is the right choice:

  • Cold start latency is unacceptable (sub-millisecond response time requirements)
  • You need edge compute in markets where CloudFront regional caches are sparse
  • You are building Worker-native patterns (Durable Objects, KV storage, R2 integration)
  • Your infrastructure is multi-cloud or not AWS-centric

CloudFront Functions fills a middle ground — extremely fast (< 1 ms) and cheap for simple header manipulation, URL rewrites, and redirects, but limited to ES5 JavaScript with 2 MB memory and no external calls.

DDoS Protection

Both platforms provide DDoS mitigation, but the model differs.

CloudFront + AWS Shield:

  • Shield Standard is free and included automatically — protects against common Layer 3/4 attacks
  • Shield Advanced ($3,000/month + data transfer fees) adds Layer 7 protection, attack diagnostics, DDoS cost protection, and 24/7 access to AWS DDoS Response Team (DRT)
  • Shield Advanced is typically justified only for organizations with regular DDoS events or regulatory requirements for incident response documentation

Cloudflare:

  • Unmetered DDoS protection is included on all plans, including the free tier
  • No separate DDoS product to purchase or configure
  • Cloudflare’s network scale (absorbing attacks at the network edge before traffic reaches your origin) is a genuine architectural advantage

For most organizations, Cloudflare’s DDoS story is simpler and cheaper. The exception is organizations that need AWS Shield Advanced’s compliance documentation, cost protection guarantees, or the DRT’s direct involvement during incidents.

Integration Depth with AWS

CloudFront’s integration with the AWS ecosystem is where it has a clear and durable advantage.

IntegrationCloudFrontCloudflare
S3 Origin Access ControlNative (OAC)Manual workaround required
API Gateway originsDirect integrationReverse proxy only
ALB/EC2 originsDirect integrationReverse proxy only
CloudWatch metricsNative, built-inThird-party integration
AWS WAFNative associationNot applicable
IAM-based signed URLsNative (CloudFront signed URLs)Not equivalent
VPC originsSupportedNot supported
ACM certificatesFree, automatic renewalFree (via Cloudflare)

If your application is fully AWS-native — S3-hosted assets, API Gateway, ALB origins, WAF rules, CloudWatch dashboards — CloudFront is the lower-complexity option. Introducing Cloudflare adds a second control plane, a second DNS provider (or split DNS configuration), and a second point of failure.

Free Tier and Entry-Level Pricing

CloudFrontCloudflare
Free tier type12-month AWS Free Tier onlyPermanent free tier
Data transfer (free)1 TB/month (12 months)Unlimited (rate-limited)
HTTP/S requests (free)10 million/month (12 months)Unlimited
SSL/TLSFree (via ACM)Free
DDoS protectionShield Standard (free, always)Included on all plans
WAFNot included freeNot on free plan (Pro+)
Edge computeCloudFront Functions: 2M invocations/month freeWorkers: 100K requests/day free
After free tierPay-as-you-go (no minimum)Free plan continues (limited features)
Bandwidth cost example (10 TB)~$85/month$0 on Pro plan

Explore other technical comparisons:

Why Work With FactualMinds

FactualMinds is an AWS Select Tier Services Partner — a verified AWS designation earned through demonstrated technical expertise and customer success. Our architects have run production workloads for companies from seed-stage startups to enterprises.

  • AWS Select Tier Partner — verified by AWS Partner Network
  • Architecture-first approach — we evaluate your specific workload before recommending a solution
  • No lock-in consulting — we document everything so your team can operate independently
  • AWS Marketplace Seller

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Cloudflare cheaper than CloudFront?
For most traffic volumes, Cloudflare is cheaper for data transfer. Cloudflare's Pro plan ($20/month) includes unlimited bandwidth, while CloudFront charges $0.0085–$0.12 per GB depending on the origin region — costs that add up quickly at scale. However, the comparison shifts when you factor in the full stack: Cloudflare's WAF, DDoS protection, and Workers are included in paid plans, while CloudFront requires separate charges for AWS WAF ($5–$10/month base plus $0.60 per million requests evaluated), Shield Standard (free), and Shield Advanced ($3,000/month). Organizations already paying for AWS services often find the total cost difference smaller than it appears.
Does CloudFront have a free tier?
Yes. The AWS Free Tier includes 1 TB of data transfer out, 10 million HTTP/HTTPS requests, and 2 million CloudFront Function invocations per month for the first 12 months. After the free tier, CloudFront does not have a permanent free tier. Cloudflare offers a permanent free tier with unlimited bandwidth (rate-limited), basic DDoS protection, and free SSL — making it the default choice for low-traffic personal or startup projects where cost is the primary driver.
Can I use Cloudflare with AWS?
Yes, Cloudflare can sit in front of AWS origins including EC2, ALB, S3, and API Gateway. This is a common configuration for teams that want Cloudflare WAF, DDoS protection, and Workers while keeping their infrastructure on AWS. The trade-off is that you lose CloudFront-specific integrations — Lambda@Edge, CloudFront Functions, and direct S3 origin access control. You also add a network hop and a second vendor dependency. Some teams use both: Cloudflare as the public-facing CDN and CloudFront internally for S3 origins and CloudFront Functions.
What is Lambda@Edge vs Cloudflare Workers?
Both services execute code at CDN edge nodes, but they differ significantly. Lambda@Edge runs Node.js or Python functions at 13 AWS edge locations (CloudFront Regional Edge Caches) and has cold starts of 100–500 ms on the first invocation. Cloudflare Workers runs JavaScript/WebAssembly at 300+ locations globally with zero cold starts — Workers uses V8 isolates instead of full container-style execution, making startup essentially instantaneous. Workers also has a more generous free tier (100,000 requests/day). Lambda@Edge is the better choice when your edge logic needs AWS SDK access, IAM-based authentication, or tight integration with other AWS services. Workers wins on raw performance, global reach, and developer experience for pure edge compute tasks.
Which CDN is better for performance?
Cloudflare has a larger edge network (300+ PoPs vs CloudFront's ~600 edge locations globally, but Cloudflare's are more densely distributed in emerging markets), zero cold starts on Workers, and consistently scores well in third-party CDN performance benchmarks. CloudFront performs comparably in North America and Western Europe — where AWS has dense edge coverage — but may underperform Cloudflare in Southeast Asia, Latin America, and Africa. For most global applications, the performance difference is under 20 ms at the 95th percentile. If you are already on AWS and need CDN + edge functions, CloudFront is the pragmatic choice. If you are optimizing for raw global performance or developer simplicity, Cloudflare has the edge.

Not Sure Which AWS Service Is Right?

Our AWS-certified architects help engineering teams choose the right architecture for their workload, scale, and budget — before they build the wrong thing.